Fidelity and Guarantee Life to Discontinue Accelerator Annuity Product Line

annuity rates | compare annuitiesToday we hit a 10 year Treasury interest rate of 1.7% for the first time since Eisenhower was in office.  With these all time low rates comes much stress on the insurance carriers who are regulated to invest heavily in safe bonds like the 10 year Treasury.  We have already seen quite a few carriers lowering rates, caps, and even pulling some products.

 

The latest to discontinue a product line is F&G (Fidelity and Guarantee) with their announcement with the Accelerator Series:

 

Fidelity and Guaranty Life has announced that new business sales of the FG Index-Accelerator 7 and 10 products will be discontinued effective with the May 22, 2012 buy date.

 

Business Transition Rules:

 

•The last buy date for FG Index-Accelerator 7 and 10 will be May 22, 2012.

•Cash with application deadline is two days prior to the last buy date, or May 18, 2012.

•1035 Exchange deadline is one day prior to last buy date, or May 21, 2012.

 

Both cash with application and 1035 exchange deadlines assume applications are received in “good order.”

 

For more information on Fidelity and Guarantee and other annuities, visit Annuity Think Tank.

 


Things To Consider Before Buying Facebook Stock

Annuity rates | Compare AnnuitiesThe big news is obvious. Facebook IPO ready to be traded.  Matt Krantz at USA Today has some valid points to consider before making the decision to jump on the band wagon…

 

Limited trading history. Investors can usually eyeball a stock’s past trading to get a general idea of where the it trades and how volatile it is. But with no public trading history to examine, Facebook will be leading investors into a dark tunnel.

 

Limited operating history. The company has only provided a few years of revenue and profit information. In addition, the company is in an emerging area of social media, which is still in its infancy. While Facebook as a strong lead, its profitability will likely attract intense competitors and could threaten its success.

 

Over-concentration of portfolio in a fledgling industry. One of the big mistakes beginning investors make is betting too heavily on a single company or industry. Making a single, untested stock your first entry in the world of investing doesn’t give you one of the only advantages investors can have: diversification. If you spread your money over a basket of stocks and industries, you can reduce the vicious swings in the value of your portfolio. Beginning investors tend to panic amid volatility, and betting on just one stock, even if it’s Facebook, may tempt you to overreact. A broader, diversified portfolio will likely be easier to stick with.

 

Annuity Think Tank

 

 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Change The 60/40 Porfolio Split?

annuity rates | compare annuitiesThe old school way of thinking seems to be changing.  It used to be that advisors would do a 60/40 split in clients portfolios with 60% stocks and 40% bonds to balance risk. A lot of clients still want the safety aspect, but bonds don’t seem to be doing to well lately.  This is a perfect place for an indexed, fixed, or multi-year guarantee annuity.  One advisor in a survey said real estate is the place to be. Investment news has this article on the subject…

 

Financial advisers no longer sing the praises of asset allocation models that use 60% stocks and 40% bonds to seek returns and balance investment risks. Indeed, according to a new survey, advisers want new methods for portfolio construction.

 

About half of the 163 advisers who responded to the survey said they are ambivalent about the benefits of the traditional 60/40 mix. In fact, 40% said flat-out that they believe the strategy is no longer the best way to achieve performance and manage risk.

 

Barely one in five of the advisers surveyed said they believe the 60/40 strategy is still the best method. “Our research confirms that financial advisers are questioning the merits of time-honored portfolio construction strategies and looking for new solutions,” said John T. Hailer, chief executive of Natixis Global Asset Management.

 

Many respondents — 63% — said they either don’t believe in or aren’t sure of the value of long-term buy-and-hold strategies, according to the study, released by Natixis on Wednesday.

 

About 40% of the advisers said new asset allocation models and portfolio construction methods are needed, while only a little more than 20% said they favor what they’re using now.

 

Financial adviser Neal Frankle of Wealth Resources Group said the 60/40 asset allocation method can’t be used the same way it has been for the past 30 years.

 

When he relies on it, he works with a dynamic portfolio of stocks, and on the fixed income side, he has switched to all short- or medium-term bonds.

 

The biggest allocation shift he’s made with clients is to increasingly add physical real estate as an alternative asset for some clients, he said.

 

“Real estate, for the right client, is the right place now because prices are low and it can produce an income stream,” he said.


Annuity Think Tank

Enhanced by Zemanta

Self Insure While Shifting Your Risk – The Alternative To Traditional Long Term Care

Every once in a while, we publish content from one of our trusted financial professionals out in the field.  This week, Barry Goldwater, Principal at Goldwater Financial Group, impressed us with his excellent article on an exciting alternative to traditional long term care.  Please enjoy Barry’s article below.

 

The way we think about our health is extremely interesting in a denial sort of way. There

is a very large pod of people who practice some of the unhealthiest lifestyles and who

believe nothing adverse will affect their health moving forward. This is why greater than

half the population in overweight and many of them detrimentally so even though there is

evidence reported every week that asserts that practically every disease can be controlled

by weight loss and healthy eating. For some reason, our behavior is irrational; we have

the facts available to support longer life if we change behavior, but as we all know,

change is extremely difficult.

 

Regardless of the facts vs. denial argument, there is a very unique way to address our

clients concerns and complaints about the premium to cover the risk of a long term care

event that may never be needed. Denial about future health possibilities are very real and

one solution that specifically addresses this planning objection is found in a product

called “Hybrid Life Insurance”. When designed properly, hybrid life seamlessly morphs

into long term care insurance liquidity, meaning, the life insurance contract will pay for

medical services not covered properly by health insurance contracts. If care is not needed,

the premium refund of all contributions comes back in the form of a tax free death benefit

to beneficiaries. Lastly, because there are no surrender charges attached to the premium

contribution and the insured can get 100% of their initial contribution back at any time in

their lifetime, we can make the analogy that this contribution is part of the self insuring

pool of money that the insured has dedicated to cover a long term care event. To be clear,

hybrid life insurance addresses four distinct areas of concern, complaint and objection for

many clients who are currently self insuring the long term care risk, namely;

 

  • Nothing will happen to me because I feel so good now, it is not possible.
  • I am throwing my premiums down the toilet because I will never need this.
  • I am losing investment income on premiums paid.
  • Why create surrender charges on money that is now liquid?

 

Here is an example of a recent planning case using the concept of self insuring and yet transferring the risk which addresses all of these concerns.

 

Husband and Wife ages 65,64.

 

Self insuring pool of money available (liquid net worth, IRAs, 401k’s etc.) $4 million

One time contribution for the Husband to the Hybrid; $250K, for the wife $200K. He is

older, his contribution is a little larger.

Asset protection liquidity for a long term care event; $ 1.9 million combined.

Initial Life Insurance Benefit $1,100,000 Combined

Level Life Insurance Benefit $635,000 Ultimate

 

$450,000 is to be managed by the insurance company.

$3.55 million remains in current management position.

Total assets available to insured, $4 million without surrender charge, just like before.

 

If a long term event occurs for husband at age 75, the $250K he moved to the insurance

company turns into $991,000 of potential benefit liquidity for his care. If this event

occurred in the 10th year of procuring this hybrid contract, his internal rate of return on

his original $250K insurance premium is 11.8%, if he triggers in year 15, his IRR is

8.3%, if he triggers in 20 years, his IRR is 6.3%. Rate of return is calculated by figuring

how long money has been used, total benefits available and initial contribution. These

rates of return are all acceptable and solid in some years, exceptional in other years.

The rate of return of a hybrid life policy is the inverse of growth investing; it is not how much

one can earn on the initial contribution, it is what one earns from the benefits derived.

 

If the husband dies in the 10th year of this contract, his family gets $410K tax free, the

on the death benefit is 5.1%, if he dies in year 15, it is 2.6%. His family always gets

back their original contribution and more because of the life insurance benefit and

because of this, he has self insured his premium risk.

 

In summary, For people who believe in self insuring their long term care risk for

whatever reason, the investment value of the original premium to transfer this risk to an

insurance company is realized when the contributor needs care and not calculated on an

annual return basis. Because there is never a surrender charge associated with the

premium, it can be argued that the premium is still includable in a clients net worth and

always available for use. And because there is always a return of original premium in life

or death, it can be argued that the insured has entered into a form of self insurance for

future long term care disability. If they become disabled, their benefit for care is

significantly higher than their original premium. In this way, they have transferred their

risk of asset depletion to an insurance company. This solution may be a much smarter

way to cover the future possibility of a long term disability. No one can predict life’s

uncertainties.

 

Barry Goldwater is Principal at Goldwater Financial Group, an insurance consulting firm

since 1985. He works with business owners, retirees and advisors designing tax efficient

solutions that make sense and are easy to implement. He can be reached at barry@frg-creative.com

or 617-527-9736 or visit his site at www.safemoneyboston.com

 

Please make sure to read more of Barry Goldwater’s content at Safe Money Boston

 

* This blog is purely educational.  Nothing in this blog should be construed as investment advice

 

 


Can We Just Leave Glenn Neasham Alone?

annuity rates | compare annuitiesI am pretty certain that everyone in the industry has now heard the tragic story about Glenn Neasham getting a prison sentence from selling a California approved Allianz annuity to an 83 year old. I am also pretty certain that most of us agree that Glenn being found guilty of “theft” was a bit outrageous regardless of what you may or may think of Glenn personally. When you throw in the fact that Mr Neasham did not have a penny of this client’s money it is tough to imagine how any jury could make those conclusions. So my question to everyone out there is why can’t we give Glenn our support, learn from this debacle, and move on? The weekly barrage of Glenn Neasham guilt analysis and overview is beginning to make us look like a bunch of news reporters thriving on negative gossip the second we get a chance to.

 

I would wager to bet that Glenn Neasham and his entire family would much rather our time and energy go into giving them support, than writing articles with our best guesses to why he may or may not be guilty. The last 30 days there have been countless articles, blogs, and industry nonsense about things Glenn could have done differently, play by play on why he was found guilty, and even a couple conspiracy theories on his judgment. The ensuing articles and commentary from his final court appearance remind me of the Don Henley song, “Dirty Laundry” -

 

Dirty little secrets

Dirty little lies

We got our dirty little fingers in everybody’s pie

We love to cut you down to size

We love dirty laundry

 

Let’s give it a rest folks, and let Glenn try to get on with his life and rebuild. By no means am I suggesting we don’t give him our support and come together as financial professionals as Frank Laise suggested in his article, “You’re sick of the Neasham case: Why you should care”. There is even an Appellate Trust fund where you can donate if you believe in standing behind Glenn and backing up our industry in general if you so choose. So all I am proposing is that we turn our focus to some positive aspects of this industry, our job at hand as financial professionals, and give Glenn Neasham a much deserved break.

 

Today our country is facing a retirement dilemma unlike anything it has experienced before. Only a select portion of baby boomers lucked out with a lifetime pension. The majority are now scratching their heads wondering how this thing called a 401k can deliver an income stream for the remainder of their life. We have an extremely important message to get out to the public, and the last thing we need to be doing is tearing down or belittling one of our own fallen soldiers.

 

Annuity Rates | Compare Annuities

 

 

 


“Safe Money San Antonio”, A New Retirement Educational Website For Baby Boomers And Retirees, Is Released This Week By Metropolitan CMG.

annuity rates | compare annuitiesA San Antonio based Retirement Income and Safe Money planning team, Metropolitan CMG teamed up this week with Annuity Think Tank to create a new educational retirement income website called “Safe Money San Antonio”. This new informative retirement website will feature daily retirement and income planning content including blogs, articles, and retirement focused white papers. “Safe Money San Antonio” will also highlight relevant retirement videos focused on the importance of contractually guaranteed lifetime income and the pros and cons of annuities.

 

A recent retirement study by Blackrock titled, “Reengineering Retirement”, revealed that baby boomers are completely rethinking retirement. Instead of looking for growth and high returns, the fear of outliving their nest egg has turned the focus to preservation of principal, safety, and income. As baby boomers and retirees in the San Antonio area begin to search the web for the best retirement information, the need for up to date and unbiased research is crucial. The site, http://www.SafeMoneySan Antonio.com was designed to make retirement education easy for baby boomers online. SafeMoneySan Antonio.com updates with new retirement relevant information and articles on a daily basis and can serve as the one stop shop for retirement instruction for San Antonio baby boomers.

 

About Wiley Carter and Metropolitan CMG

 

Metropolitan CMG principal Wiley Carter has over 30 years’ experience in the field of financial services. Mr. Carter holds the designations of CRP, as a Certified Retirement Planner and CRPC, Chartered Retirement Planning Counselor from the College of Financial Planners in Denver, Colorado. He has conducted workshop seminars and one on one counseling throughout the United States and abroad in Germany, Switzerland & Austria since joining the financial services industry in 1977.

 

Mr. Carter has also worked in the brokerage industry for firms providing services and products such as stocks, bonds, mutual funds, commodities, insurance, annuities, realty, mortgages and business analyst consulting over the years. Mr. Carter has focused the last 11 years on estate and retirement planning. Metropolitan CMG clients are seniors, retirees, government employees and business owners. Most of our clients are looking for solutions to Long Term Care, Lifetime Retirement Income, Insurance, Annuities and safe money strategies that provide the potential to deliver exceptional performance and provide for a reduction or elimination of estate, gift and income taxes. We work with financial institutions, affiliate financial planners, and board certified legal and accounting firms to provide comprehensive financial services. Services include: retirement planning, tax free & tax deferred income strategies, life time income, annuity advice and selection, life and long-term care insurance, planning for nursing home care and Medicaid spend down strategies, tax reduction or elimination, estate planning, business succession planning, access to conservator-ship and trust and trustee services. Our mission is to provide the most current information available with access to financial products, instruments and tax efficient strategies to protect your assets and your legacy, maximize current and future income with continued growth without exposure to risk of capital.

 

About Annuity Think Tank

 

Annuity Think Tank’s vision is to be the first place advisors and consumers come to for innovative annuity solutions, unbiased annuity education, annuity research, and the most comprehensive annuity information on the web. Advisors and financial professionals, please visit our site designed for you at Annuitythinktank.com. For further questions contact us toll free at (855)888-6494 or email us at info(at)annuitythinktank.com. We appreciate any and all feedback including new video ideas, blogs, and annuity concepts.


A Working Retirement

annuity rates | compare annuitiesI’m relatively young. Mid 30′s.  I’ve been in this industry for a while and I’ve hear them all. What worries me the most about retirement is it never coming.  A greeter at Walmart is in my future.  Mind you, there is nothing wrong with that, people do what they can to get by.

 

When I retire, that’s what I want to do, stop working all together and retire. Investment management firm BlackRock found in a recent survey that most workers are concerned about not having enough money to last through retirement. Because of that, many people are planning on working at least part time during their retirement years.

 

Nearly eight of 10 defined-contribution plan sponsors polled by BlackRock said that the days of working until age 65 and then retiring for good are “generally over for most workers.”

 

“Retirement is going to change,” BlackRock U.S. & Canada Defined Contribution Group managing director Chip Castille said in a statement, “and one of the biggest changes will likely be an enduring role for employment even in retired life.”

 

Castille added that, for some retirees, the choice to stay employed could be a benefit. However, for others, it could be something forced by economic hardship – decidedly a less positive factor.

 

Annuity Think Tank

Enhanced by Zemanta